Home > Recruitment Questions > Q&A: How can the US fight a world wide war on terror without a draft or a real national military recruiting effort?

Q&A: How can the US fight a world wide war on terror without a draft or a real national military recruiting effort?

February 24th, 2011 admin Leave a comment Go to comments
Title:

Q&A: How can the US fight a world wide war on terror without a draft or a real national military recruiting effort?




Question by Snowshoe: How can the US fight a world wide war on terror without a draft or a real national military recruiting effort?

Best answer:

Answer by JennoftheJungle
The more important question to ask, is how the feck can we fight a war when the PC crowd screams bloody murder anytime someone dies?

We need some shock and awe.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Possibly Related Posts and Articles (automatically generated)
  1. SatanicYoda
    February 24th, 2011 at 18:10 | #1

    Simple!

    We can’t.

    We also can’t do it without budgeting for a war. When in history has a government cut taxes to pay for a war? What stupidity!

  2. 43
    February 24th, 2011 at 18:58 | #2

    They got all screwed up with Rumsfeld’s “Transformation” policy.

    Rumsfeld watched Robo Cop and got the idea we could have a smaller super Army/Navy

    This is the root of the problem.

    Go big Red Go

  3. carl.motley@sbcglobal.net
    February 24th, 2011 at 19:36 | #3

    First, apprehend all the terrorists operating out of the White House. That would probably be enough to stop the flow of terrorism worldwide. Then hold the CIA, NSA, and all the other A ending organizations connected to Bush and his neocon cronies to account.

  4. Mikira
    February 24th, 2011 at 20:01 | #4

    Good question. First off this won’t be a war with a noticable front line. (Except for what’s going on in Iraq and Afghanistan.) This will a war much like the Cold War. So everyone has to get involved. Meaning bankers, airport security and other such organizations.

    The banks need to look for the same thing they would in the Drug Wars. Huge transactions that look suspect would need to be investigated.

    Airport security needs to do what it’s doing now.

    And I’m sure others on here have a few other ways that the War on Terrorism can be fought.

  5. Fast Eddie B
    February 24th, 2011 at 20:17 | #5

    You’re seriously confused; this “war” doesn’t require troops as much as it requires a comprehensive effort to deny the slimebags their money and places of refuge.

    BTW (and I’m sure you’ve managed to not notice), the “war” on terror is going very, very well for us; the number of slimebags are being reduced at this moment while you and I sit here playing with ourselves.

    Like the man said “Don’t worry, be happy!”

  6. jessezgl_2005
    February 24th, 2011 at 21:01 | #6

    Thats what I’ve been saying for 3 months now.
    You can see it coming if you got half a brain and can think for yourself without letting Bush and the repugs dictate how you think!!! You can’t tell them though. All they can come up with is that its going to be the dems fault if we have a draft. Even John McCain their next presidential candidate says it’s not possible to win without a draft!!!
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AgbXHaZ1zAIjLOcR9_VlLVHsy6IX?qid=20061212063613AA5yGQh

    aviator: they run those ads right after the invasion and then stopped now they are at it again and yea like you said all the time
    what does that say to you

  7. Aviator
    February 24th, 2011 at 21:19 | #7

    I’m sorry, but you must not see those army, air force, marines, and navy commercials I see about every 5 seconds. I think there is a pretty good military recruiting effort. But I think they need to do something different. For one, I would raise the income of people in the military. The draft isn’t a bad idea, but I think better management of the current army could keep the draft from being instituted.

  1. No trackbacks yet.